The recent incident at Diaper Times points out the need to understand certain things about websites. Here is a look at criteria for making judgements about this or any site.
This all bears on the technical merits of the site.A free, personal site should not be judged as stringently as a professional, supported or paysite.If we had a moderately good turnkey social network system, we would be the equal of Diaper Times in their own area (as it is we do have secondary social network capability and are about half as good there) right out of the box and that is not counting all the things we have WHICH SEE
A one-person free site must needs be less stringently evaluated than a professional site since, first, no money is coming out of your purse and the one person is the designer, editor and implementor. That person is usually self-taught with an unknown level of training, more interested in the subject than the ins and outs of presentation or mechanics. There will be many more spelling or typographical errors because Self-proofreading is the least effective. Grammar will not be A-level but probably B or even C+; as long as it is understandable. Some persons prefer the look and feel of such sites since they are "homey", with a human touch and reflect a Real Person's activities. A personal site owner does not spend the kind of money for things that a group, professional, ad-supported or paysite owner will or even have the access to the material. Here is an example. Diaper Times is a professional, ad supported, free-access social network site. They use an implementation of the Elogg system. Now, elogg would be to die for on a personal site. It is a third-rate but free social network system designed for schools and the like. However for a dedicated professional social network site, it is inferior. It is what Diaper Times uses: the same Diaper Times that bashed this site on the basis of not being professional; "poorly put together [it was put together to do the job it does in as expeditiously a manner as possible and it evolved to be what it is over a decade, and was called 'good looking' by one of the IT professionals at Register Inc our Domain Name Server]": Someone does not have her tiara on straight. Daily Diaper has the same specifications but uses a social network system that cost $US300 and $US50/mo to run. and has a couple of minor glitcches. Daily Diaper is becoming the gold standard of AB/DL social network sites and criticizes nobody. Personal sites are usually paid for out-of-pocket and not ad-supprted or subscriber supported. so unless the owner can throw around a lot of money, she has to make do with what she can find at no or low cost. But even that has its good points. Finding and using poverty row materials often makes possible certain perks that you do not get elsewhere. Their creators like to have them distributed as a matter of pride, hence, we have things like FairyWand, SmartyPanties and other take-aways